Speaking truth to power

HomeOfficeImmigrationPosterHaving been brought up a Methodist, I can’t ever quite get away from thinking of September as the start of the New Year.  The next 12 (or more precisely 20) months are likely to tell us a lot about what sort of society we are – and want to be – on these British Isles of ours.

As the 2015 General Election creeps ever closer, the shape of the political debates which will frame the next twenty months are starting to be mapped out.  I’m sure we will see much more of this as the annual party political conference season gets under way at the end of the month.  And the omens are not looking good..

Over the summer, the Home Office kicked off a deliberately provocative campaign to target illegal immigrants, with mobile billboards touring London announcing “In the UK illegally? Go home or face arrest” and high profile arrests of ‘alleged’ illegal immigrants at tube and train stations.

A flurry of faith leaders publicly condemned the actions including Patrick Lynch, the Roman Catholic Bishop for Migration, stating that “This mobile billboard campaign is a very inappropriate way to discourage illegal immigrants from staying in the UK, not least because the message that is often received is that all immigrants and foreigners are unwelcome in the UK.”

Sadly, all the indications are that the reason for the campaign was much more to do with party politics than persuading anyone to ‘go home.’ Even if no one actually leaves the country as a result, the campaign will have achieved its aim:  A series of headlines which show the Conservatives are ‘tough on immigration’ designed to encourage erstwhile UKIP supporters to ‘return’ to the Tory fold, and vote Conservative at the forthcoming European and General Elections instead.

Worryingly, the signs are that what passes for ‘debate’ about the future of welfare in this country is also being shaped not so much by the needs of people in poverty – but by the pressure on politicians to be seen to ‘act tough on scroungers.’   And expect more tough talk over the coming weeks and months.

The troubling fact is that by their constant repetition, the lies that ‘everyone on poverty are lazy and feckless – and that the welfare system only encourages them in their idleness’ are have a profound and corrosive effect on public opinion.    All the signs are that, even as the cuts to welfare are starting to bite, support for welfare spending appears to be declining.

When politicians use language designed to drive a wedge between so called ‘Strivers and Shirkers’ beware. 

It is based on a cold political calculation that it will win more votes than lose them – and will paint the opposition party into a corner where, if it stands up for those at the bottom, it risks being seen as a party ‘on the side of shirkers.’

It is into this toxic political climate that the leaders of the Free Churches – the URC, Methodists, Baptists and Church of Scotland – are speaking, when they denounce in forthright terms the comfortable myths – and downright lies – about poverty, which we are repeatedly told by politicians and sections of the press.

It is not an easy or comfortable place to be in, when you are repeatedly called to challenge senior politicians (from the Prime Minister downwards) over their seeming willingness to play politics with the lives of people who are suffering real hardship in the face of years of recession, economic crisis and spending cuts.

This autumn will see the publication of a major new report from Churches Together in Britain and Ireland on the theme of the ‘Good Society.’  People of faith and no faith in a range of communities up and down the UK were asked to define for themselves what they understood to be the marks of a Good Society.   You’ll have to wait for the publication of the report to know what they said – but the question goes to the heart of this debate.

What are the marks of a ‘Good Society’? 

How do we treat people who are marginalised, socially or economically, by reason of their class, gender, race, religion  or immigration status in a Good Society?   How do we carry our common life together – from the streetlevel right up to national political debate – in a way which is consistent with and condusive of a Good Society?

And how are we to conduct ourselves as Christians and as the Church in ways which bear witness to our own beliefs about a Good Society?

Surely this is not a task that those called to Christian discipleship can turn away from. In that wonderful phrase coined by the Quakers, as Christians we are called to ‘speak truth to power.’   Or in the words of Luther, ‘Here I am, I can do no other.’

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Speaking truth to power

  1. niallcooper says:

    Reblogged this on A Fair Say and commented:

    Our Director’s latest thoughts on the challenge of Speaking truth to power…

  2. Niall,
    I always like the thrust and purpose of what you say. And this is no exception. But… I wanted to go off on a bit of a tangent and ask you about your words, ‘People of…no faith..’. Who are people of no faith? I don’t believe this is a silly semantic question, but rather one which strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Christian. Is a Christian someone who believes all the doctrine / believes without proof? Or is a Christian someone like the Syro-phoenician woman or the Roman Centurian who were commended for their ‘faith’ simply for approaching Jesus in a straightforward manner with their eyes open as to what he was trying to do – i.e. change the world by standing in solidarity with the marginalised? Maybe I am being to cryptic? What I am trying to say is that I don’t understand this term ‘people of no faith’ though it is used all the time. It seems to me that some folk who are the least religious have the most faith.

    • niallcooper says:

      Thanks for this. I think I was meaning something much simpler – that some people self-identify themselves with one or other of the major ‘faith’ traditions – Christianity, Islam, Judaism etc – and some people do not. But at a deeper level, I agree with you 100% – being religious is certainly not a precondition for being faithful! And fundamentally, all human beings have the capacity for faith, empathy and solidarity – and in that sense, speaking truth to power is an obligation on us all.

      • thanks, Neil. Yes, I appreciate what you were saying about ‘faith’ traditions. But don’t you think this is a, possibly deliberately, unhelpful phrase which is banded about? To me, it suggests that religious people are somehow superior because they ‘have faith’. Surely no-one wants to be described as having ‘no faith’? But more than that, i believe the use of the word ‘faith’ has huge ramifications for what it is that Church folk stand for – is it a religious belief in a supernatural God or is it a political worldview based on loving the neighbour as self?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s