Re-uniting the UK: 10 reasons for moving the UK’s Parliament north

Houses-of-ParliamentEarlier this week I floated the idea of moving Parliament from its current location closer to the geographic centre of the United Kingdom.  Here are ten reasons why it make sense:

1. Re-uniting and re-imaging the UK in a post-referendum world
The institutions which have held the UK together for the past three centuries are broken. The United Kingdom is no longer united, even if Scotland votes No tomorrow. If the UK is to have a future, it can only be on the basis of re-imagining what it means to be the UK in the 21st Century. 

Could there be anything with more symbolic power to re-unite the UK than moving Parliament to a new home at the centre of the United Kingdom?

2. Devolution, although essential, isn’t enough to heal the anger
The evidence from Scotland is that devolving powers (though welcome in its own right) serves only increases alienation and anger with Westminster. The risk is further devolution to the nations and English regions, without any change at the centre, will only serve to exacerbate this trend.

The only way to address the anger with the Westminster domination of politics is to transform the institution at its heart: The UK Parliament.

3. Taking Parliament out of the hands of the ‘Westminster elite’
One of the strongest complaints not just in Scotland, but across the rest of the country is that the UK is run by and for the benefit of a ‘Westminster elite.’ What better way of wresting it from the hands of a (real or perceived) elite than to move it from Westminster? Of course this alone won’t be enough to break the power of the elite, but a geographical change of perspective could provide a driving force for reshaping UK politics more generally.

4. Reshaping how politics is done
A new building in a new location could help re-shape politics away from the adversarial bear-pit of the Palace of Westminster, and help establish a more transparent, consensual political culture, no longer bound by centuries of tradition and procedure at Westminster.

If you doubt the power of architecture to shape a more open and transparent political culture, visit the Reichstag in Berlin.

5. Reinvigorating the economy of the North
Relocating the UK Parliament (even without moving most of the institutions of Whitehall) to the North would provide a huge economic boost to whichever city and region it moved to. Not just the construction of a new Parliament building, and offices for hundreds of Parliamentarians and their staff, but the knock on impact in terms of the relocation of lobbyists, think tanks and the like.

6. Reducing the power of the City of London
Moving Parliament to the North would not break the power of the City of London, but it would reduce its power over politics. A geographic separation of two hundred miles would provide a useful ‘distance’ between corporate and political power.

Two of our strongest competitors, the US and Germany, function very well with Government and finance in separate cities: Washington and New York; Berlin and Frankfurt.

7. Rebalancing power away from London
London is rightly a global city that the UK can be proud of, but its relation with the rest of the UK is increasingly toxic. The concentration on London politics, art, sport and media is detrimental to the cultural, political and economic life of the nation as a whole. As a result, too much of current public discourse and policy making serves only to confuse what is in London’s interest with what is in the UK’s interest.

8. Reducing London’s over-heated economy
Arguably London and Londoners will be the biggest beneficiaries of the relocation of Parliament. One of London’s most pressing problems itself is its overheated economy. Land and house prices are simply too high. Moving Parliament and all that goes with it (lobbyists, think tanks etc) would help reduce the overheating.

No long the seat of a working Parliament (other than for ceremonial occasions) the Palace of Westminster could become one of London’s principle tourist attractions.

9. Its perfectly possible: The Germans have already done it
ReichstagIf anyone thinks its simply not possible to move the institutions of Government 200 miles north – well the Germans have already done it. An historically divided nation was brought together by the relocation of the German federal parliament 300 miles from Bonn to Berlin. With the advent of HS2 in particular, it will be perfectly feasible to do the same in the UK: Manchester, Leeds and Liverpool will be as close to central London as much of outer London and the South East.

10. Parliament needs to move in any case
The Palace of Westminster is in need of major refurbishment, which means that both Houses of Parliament will need to relocate whilst the work is undertaken in the next few years. Under plans currently being considered by MPs, this could be for a period of up to five years.

Why not take this historic opportunity to move North on a trial basis?

A number of MPs (not just from the North), including Frank Field (Birkenhead) and Gavin Shuker (Luton) have already floated the idea of moving Parliament north.  So why not do it?

You know it makes sense…

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Comments

Challenging the metropolitan elite: Lets move Parliament to the centre of the UK

The biggest threat to the UK isn’t Scotland but a metropolitan elite.  Some of my Scottish colleagues may demur, but for me the real problem the UK is facing is a metropolitan elite, increasingly out of touch with the rest of the UK.

Houses-of-ParliamentI was struck by a comment from a ‘Yes’ voter that Scotland’s problem was that as just 8.4% of UK population, Scots suffered because Government favoured the interests of the other 91.6%.  That’s certainly not what it looks or feels like sat in the North of England, nor I suspect its what it feels like in Wales, Cornwall or much of the rest of the UK.

For me, the real problem that many of us share is a sense of disenfranchisement by a hollowed out democractic and political process run from the a city at the south-eastern periphery of these islands (London).  Not that folk in London think they are at the periphery (whatever the hard geographic facts might say):  London, of course, is at ‘the centre of national life.’

But London itself is code.  The ‘London’ at the centre of national life does not include the majority of the population of Greater London, many of whom almost certainly feel as excluded from access to power as the rest of us.

No, the UK is effectively governed by a small metropolitan elite, concentrated almost entirely withn the twin cities of Westminster and the City of London (but with useful scholarly outposts in Oxford, Cambridge and Eton).

A privately educated, Oxbridge elite

social_mobilityAs the recent report of the Social Mobility Task Force rather bluntly concluded: Elitism so embedded in Britain that it could be called “social engineering.”   The report’s 70 pages conclusively demonstrate the extent to which the ‘nations institutions’ (almost all based in London of course) are dominated by a privately schooled and Oxbridge elite.

Only 7% of members of the public attended a private school. But 71% of senior judges, 62% of senior officers in the armed forces, 55% of permanent secretaries in Whitehall, 53% of senior diplomats, 50% of members of the House of Lords and 45% of public body chairs did so.

Oxbridge graduates also have a stranglehold on top jobs. They comprise less than 1% of the public as a whole, but 75% of senior judges, 59% of cabinet ministers, 57% of permanent secretaries, 50% of diplomats, 47% of newspaper columnists, 44% of public body chairs, 38% of members of the House of Lords, 33% of BBC executives, 33% of shadow cabinet ministers, 24% of MPs and 12% of those on the Sunday Times Rich List.

If you want to thoroughly depress yourself, the Guardian has very helpfully given a detailed datablog outlining the reach of this elite into pretty much every corner of public life.  And, yes, should you ask, half of all Church of England Bishops are also privately educated.

The Westminster village: A wider metropolitan groupthink

Eton-school-boys-make-the-007But the UK’s metropolitan bias runs much deeper than where people went to school.  The bulk of the UK’s so-called ‘national institutions’ and ‘public debate’ is hermetically sealed within a tiny Westminster village, with a radius of about 2 miles, to the effective the exclusion of the rest of the UK.

I’ve lost track of the number of times I have been invited to policy seminars, report launches or other ‘national’ conferences which start at 9.30am (or worse still ‘breakfast briefings’ at 8.30am) – all on the assumption that ‘everyone’ lives or works in central London. Although it might come as a surprise to those locked into a metropolitan world-view, only an eighth of the UK’s population live in London – and 87.5% dont.

But that doesn’t stop the metropolitan elite from claiming that ‘national’ is the same as ‘London-based’ and anything located anywhere else in the UK can be passed off with the moniker ‘regional.’  It is telling how our mental mind maps are warped by London-centric thinking – when actually London is in geographic terms very much at the south-eastern periphery of the UK.

An overbalanced economy

IPPR transport infrastructure spendingEconomically, the UK is equally unbalanced in favour of London.  The London economy (and the City of London economy within it) can either be seen as the powerhouse engine of the UK economy, or alternatively as a huge suction engine, sucking in wealth, talent and investment.  The IPPR North think tank (note: as opposed to the London-based IPPR, which is simply ‘IPPR’ its Northern equivalent has to be given the regional moniker), has exposed the London-bias within Government spending – most notably in relation to transport infrastructure.

As an aside, I’m always amused how the HS2 railway is described by metropolitan types as a key strategy in ‘rebalancing’ the economy – when it starts in London – and doesn’t even directly connect the North of England with Europe (which would be a far more attractive and useful proposition).

And the UK economy is vastly more unbalanced towards the capital than most of our stronger European competitors.  Whilst London’s economy is at least ten times bigger than any other UK city, Germany, Holland, Sweden have far less unbalanced economies.  In Germany’s case, there are seven cities with a comparable (or even larger) GDP as its capital, Berlin.

A symbolic rebalancing: Lets move Parliament to the centre of the UK

What could be a better symbol of a rebalancing of the UK than moving Parliament to the geographic heart of the UK?

I’m not especially arguing the case for Manchester.  For those with memories long enough to remember the ‘Eileen Bilton’ advert that ran on TV for a number of years, Warrington-Runcorn is Britain’s most central location.  So let’s move Parliament there.


Germany moved its Parliament 500km from Bonn to Berlin as a symbolic act to heal a divided nation. What about the UK?

As I write this, I can already hear the noise of the metropolitan types scoffing:  The very idea of moving the institutions of Government 200 miles north!  Impossible!  It could never be done!  And why would we want to?

Well, the Germans did it, so why can’t we?

As a means of bringing together an historically deeply divided nation, Germany moved its Parliament 600 kilometres east, from Bonn to Berlin.  We only have to move ours 300 kilometres.

So why not?

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Areia Blanca: A latter day Naboth’s vineyard


The worlds most expensive city – not Tokyo or New York – but Luanda, Angola..

What images come to mind when you think of wealth and poverty in Africa and the UK? Is development always good news for the poor? And is it time to move beyond our old ideas of a ‘rich North’ and ‘poor South’?

In August, I was privileged to accompany a delegation of Greater Manchester church leaders to spend time with some of Christian Aid’s partner organisations in Angola to seek answers to these questions…

Angola is far removed from the stereotypical image of an African ‘basket-case’ economy. Luanda, its capital, is a fantastic, bustling city, bursting at the seams with a population of around 5 million people – virtually a third of the country’s total population. After a disastrous 25 year civil war, over the past decade it has been enjoying a fabulous economic boom, due to Angola’s significant wealth in oil and diamonds.

But wealth comes at a cost. Forget Tokyo, Dubai or New York – according to international research, Luanda is now the most expensive city to live in anywhere in the world. A meal at an ‘inexpensive’ restaurant will set you back 20 US dollars, and a one bed apartment in the city centre will set you back an astonishing $3,500 (£2,100) a month. Yet an estimated two-thirds of the people living there exist on less than $2 a day…

Bordering the Atlantic, the city’s bay area is home to some of its most conspicuous wealth – and poverty – side by side. For some, the homes of the poor in ‘informal neighbourhoods’ are a chaotic eyesore, and an impediment to further development. Ramshackle houses, squeezed tight together, they are gradually being ‘replaced’ with more ‘high class’ developments, skyscraper offices, shiny four star hotels and luxury apartments.

Areia Blanca: A modern day Naboth’s vineyard

Areia Blanca

Just a stone’s throw from Angola’s new Parliament building

Barely a stone’s throw from the gleaming new Parliament building being built on the Luandan seafront, we visited a community of people who had been forcibly evicted from their homes on the aptly described Areia Blanca (White Sands) bay for just this reason.

Eighteen months ago the Government sent helicopters, bulldozers, police and military to clear the homes of this small fishing community. Several people died in the three days it took to complete the eviction. The remnants of the community have spent the past year and a half struggling to survive in tiny fly infested shacks built from tin, cardboard and whatever else they could lay their hands no, on a thin strip of beach, with no sanitation and surrounded by rubbish. The community is slowly, but literally dying, as disease takes its toll. We squeezed past one room hovels with people lying sick and too ill to move, and turned down invitations to intrude on the private grief of family whose father had died just that morning. Yet their plight is seemingly invisible to the city authorities, intent on clearing the bay for more luxury homes and hotels.

Jesus de Nazare, Areia Blanca

No sense of irony: ‘Jesus de Nazare’ fishing boat at Areia Blanca

Sitting with the dispossessed of Areia Blanca my mind went back to a time I had spent more than twenty years ago to Silvertown, at the heart of London’s Docklands; and more recently to Hulme and Ancoats on the edge of Manchester city centre. They may not have been cleared with the same degree of brutality, but their communities suffered a similar fate all the same. ‘Development’ and ‘regeneration’ has come at the expense of the dispossession and dismantling of low income communities who were not judged to ‘fit’ with the new image the city wanted to project to the world: Their land had become too valuable for them to remain. Their ‘regeneration’ could only come at the expense of their own removal.

These in turn are echoes of the story of Naboth’s vineyard (1 Kings 21). Naboth’s bad luck was that his vineyard was close to the palace of King Ahab of Samaria – and Ahab coveted his land. Naboth refused, and paid for it with his life. Yet another story of the rich dispossessing the poor of the little that they have.

For Naboth, read Areia Blanca, Ancoats, Hulme or Silvertown. In the race for ‘development’ the poorest of the poor are, seemingly, always expendable.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global wealth and local poverty: The latest evidence

Two stories from today’s news reinforce the picture of gross inequalities and growing contrasts in the fortunes of global rich and local poor.  Things can only get better?

north_southStory One: “Soaring property prices and confident stock markets help swell ranks of global super-rich.” 

More than 1.7 million people joined the ranks of the global super-rich last year.  To qualify as ‘super-rich’ requires ‘investable assets’ of more than $1 million (£600,000) – not including your main home, art collection or vintage car(s).

In Britain the numbers in this elite ‘club’ went up by more than 10 percent just in the past 12 months, to 527,000.  This equates to just under one percent of the total population.   Unsurprisingly, the majority of Britons joining the club have done so as a result of rising property prices.

Just in case you think the UK is an exception, the total number of ‘High Net Worth Individuals’ is a record 13.7 million worldwide.  Just four countries – the US, Germany, Japan – and China – are home to 60 percent of them, with Asia-Pacific the fastest growing region.

And their total net worth is forecast to grow by a further $11.7 trillion over the next 3 years…

Story two: “major study shows UK poverty doubled in 30 years.”

Meanwhile, back in Blighty, the most detailed study ever of poverty in the UK has revealed that the number of British households falling below the minimum living standards has more than doubled in the past 30 years.

The Poverty and Social Exclusion project, led by Bristol University, has found amongst a wealth of other things, that:

  • one third of households go without three or more ‘basic necessities of life’
  • 5.5 million adults go without essential clothing
  • 2.5 million children live in damp homes
  • 1.5 million children live in households who can’t afford to heat them
  • one in five adults have to borrow to pay for day to day needs.
  • a majority of children experiencing multiple deprivation are in a family with someone in work.

And finally: But for the welfare state the UK would be THE most unequal advanced western economy in the world.

And just to cheer you up further, I was at a presentation this morning on ‘the economics of inequality’ at which Ruth Lupton of Manchester University showed the following slide – which reveals that, but for the welfare state, the UK would be the number one most unequal developed western economy.

Inequality in advanced western economies - prior to tax and welfare transfers

Before taking into account the redistributive effects of taxation and benefits, the UK ranks more unequal than our 18 nearest competitor developed nations – more unequal even than the United States.  Ruth’s full presentation is available here.

Just one more reason to speak up as loudly and clearly as we can in defence of taxation and the welfare state…


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Breadline Britain: Why I’m angry

Below the BreadlineThere are few things that make me genuinely angry, but this week has been one of them.

On Monday, Church Action on Poverty, Oxfam and Trussell Trust published Below the Breadline – an expose of crisis of food poverty and hunger that increasing numbers are facing across the UK. Channel 4’s Breadline Kids did exactly the same thing.

But what have the political classes been discussing this week? Not why so many people are going hungry, but a tweet.

MPs, columnists, and today, the Deputy Prime Minister have been lining up to fulminate about the outrageous fact that Oxfam tweeted an image of the Perfect Storm. No matter that it only had ten words on it. No matter that it didn’t anywhere on the tweet say (or even imply) that the Coalition is responsible for the perfect storm. No matter that it is actually based on a well argued and reasoned Oxfam report published two years ago.  No matter that all the things listed in the ‘Perfect Storm’ (unemployment, zero-hours contracts, high prices, benefit cuts and childcare costs are patently things which people in poverty are self-evidently struggling with).  Which of these is a charity committed to tackling poverty in the UK not expected (or allowed) to mention?

But what of the scandalous fact that a million people had to turn to foodbanks to be fed in the sixth wealthiest country on the planet?

As one of the principle authors of Below the Breadline, I am not angry on my own part, but for the way in which the artificial storm blown up over a single tweet has obscured a debate about the real issue that Oxfam, Church Action on Poverty, Trussell Trust and indeed Channel 4, were seeking to highlight this week.

People are going without food, and all some politicians and commentators care about is a tweet.  

And just for the record, and the Deputy Prime Minister’s benefit, Below the Breadline is not an attack on the Government’s austerity programme. It isn’t actually an attack on the Government at all.

Below the Breadline is a cry for an informed and adult debate about how we tackle the crisis of food poverty and hunger in the UK.

I’m not asking for politicians of any colour to agree with everything we said in the report. But I would hope that they would at least be willing to engage with the real questions – and want to come up with real answers for the thousands of families who can’t look forward to being able to put a meal on the table for their kids this weekend.

At the moment, it feels like we’re a million miles from that.

And that’s what makes me angry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Below the Breadline and the Perfect Storm: Speaking truth to power

Below the BreadlineOn Monday, our latest report on food poverty and hunger – hit the headlines again. Published jointly with Oxfam and Trussell Trust, Below the Breadline highlights the further escalation in the numbers of people requiring emergency food aid over the past year – and the increasingly threadbare nature of the supposed welfare safety net.

Its publication was timed to coincide with Channel 4’s excellent Breadline Kids documentary, broadcast on Monday evening (and still available on 4oD). Breadline Kids tells the true story of food poverty and hunger from the perspective of children and young people. And whilst I’m proud of Below the Breadline, to be honest, the young people’s testimonies have far more power to convey the true awfulness of what food poverty and hunger means to those who experience it at firsthand.

Our task as churches is not only to pull people out of the river, but to ask who or what is throwing them in in the first place.

Both Below the Breadline and Breadline Kids are unashamedly hard hitting. We are facing a situation in which increasing numbers of families and children are going hungry – a fact attested to by churches, foodbanks, advice agencies, public health officers in every corner of the UK. Watching Breadline Kids makes is extremely uncomfortable. And neither is Below the Breadline intended to be a comfortable read.

Church Action on Poverty, like Oxfam, is a resolutely non-party political organisation – but we do have a duty to draw attention to the hardship suffered by poor people we work with in the UK.

How and why is it that, in the sixth wealthiest country on the planet, children are going to bed hungry?

Alongside the heroic work of foodbanks, what is the proper role of the state in preventing hunger? What happened to the idea of the welfare safety net? Alongside the long-term impacts of economic crisis, recession, low pay and rising prices and debts, what have been the impacts of the Government’s welfare reforms, and austerity measures?   What part do sanctions, benefit delays and administrative errors play?

These are rightly questions which as individuals, charities and churches we have a moral duty to ask – and to seek answers to. To ask such questions is not a sign of ‘political partisanship’ but of basic moral duty and concern for human dignity.

Church Action on Poverty is driven by a passionate belief in the dignity of all human beings.  A belief that has been central to Christian belief for the past 2,000 years and an idea that has helped shape the development of the modern British state and society.

We have a proud tradition in this country of concern for the plight of the poor and the vulnerable. It could be described as one of the core values of what it is to be British.

If any of us fell on hard times, through misfortune, sickness, unemployment, low pay or yes, even though an act of rashness, misjudgement or stupidity on our part, we would hope that, failing all else, the safety net would prevent us – or our families, friends or children – slipping into destitution and hunger. Even the Victorian poor law and the dreaded workhouse guarantee that. And slaying the giant evil of want was part of the founding vision of the modern welfare state.

Below the Breadline calls on all political parties to re-commit to the principle of the welfare safety net, and to come up with a workable programme for radically reducing the numbers who need to go to food banks.

To be sure, the shape of the safety net needs to look different in 2014 than it did in 1997 or 1979, let alone 1945. But I have heard no politician of any political party say that there is no longer a need for a safety net.

Different political parties can rightly have different views on how to tackle poverty and hunger, but to claim that any attempts to raise the issue of food poverty and hunger is somehow ‘too political’ demeans politics, and does a huge disservice to those going hungry.

The argument is not about party politics but about how we tackle poverty and hunger together, and about the proper role of faith, charity and Government (of any political persuasion) in this task.

The question fundamentally comes down to this: Do we want to live in a civilised society which ensures that no one need go hungry in the sixth richest country on the planet, or do we not?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Launching the Good Society Conversation

Listening to the periphery at the heart of Westminster

Good Society Converstaion launch, May 2014There was something intensely symbolic and powerful about yesterday’s launch of the Good Society Conversation by Churches Together in Britain and Ireland and Church Action on Poverty:

Eighty people packed into the Cardinal Hume Centre’s children’s centre, a stone’s throw from Westminster’s power places – Parliament, Whitehall, Abbey and Cathedral – yet somehow a million miles away from the formalities of what now passes for conventional ‘report launches’ or political debate.

Good Society conversations always start with listening at the periphery

As Cardinal Nichols eloquently said in his keynote speech, ‘The Good Society conversations always start with listening at the periphery. But the periphery is not always geographically distant, but rather people or places which feel distant from power.’

And the huge energy in the room came precisely from listening to the stories and voices of those living and working in the peripheries:

Kim Mathews, manager of STAK at Good Society Conversation launchKim Mathews, centre manager of St Austell’s Community Kitchen in Cornwall – a thriving café at the heart of the community, bursting at the seams, offering an extended family of friendship and support to those who would otherwise be isolated. “What makes for a Good Society: Respecting and caring for one another.”

Andi Smith, minister of Saltley Methodist Church, who responded to the realisation that women in their diverse community in Birmingham had nowhere to meet together, by helping to establish the ‘Remnants’ group: Local women, Muslim, Christian and of no particular faith, sewing together, learning new skills, but above all listening to, sharing and affirming each others’ stories. “People from different backgrounds help us see what we can’t see in ourselves, but the truth is that the church has not learned enough from projects like Remnants.”

Paula Tabakin, member of All Souls Church, Belfast with her partner and young daughter – a community in which she feels ‘beloved’, a church offering spiritual refuge to people who are hurt and excluded elsewhere.

Margaret Reynolds, longstanding Church Action on Poverty community activist from Meadowell, North Tyneside, recounting a forty year struggle – in the face of the failures of successive Governments – to bring hope to her extended family and community. And now, in face of absent local politicians, herself standing in the council elections to represent the community she lives in.

Out of such people, stories and communities is a Good Society fashioned

The Good Society: All people are of fundamentally intrinsic worth – an antidote to a society which values people only for what they are worth

Is such a vision of the Good Society the antidote to the hollowed out conversations and failed politics – of left and right – of recent years? Such was the challenge posed by Maurice Glasman, ex-community organiser and living wage campaigner – and now enobled member of the House of Lords? “If we are to forge the Common Good we need to learn to live with tensions and face up to the arguments in a relational way. We need to challenge elites and build a politics based on people who represent communities where they live.”

Faith traditions are well placed to take on this challenge, because we have a radically different notion of human value and the Good Society, according to Elizabeth Oldfield, director of the think tank Theos: “Unlike others who value people only in terms of wealth, work, education or ‘hotness’, we believe that people are fundamentally of intrinsic worth.”

The Good Society: A potential to fill a void in politics and public services

Echoing all that had gone before, Caroline Slocock of Civil Exchange, endorsed the call: “Our task is to fashion a new politics and language of the Common Good. The Good Society conversation has the potential to fill a void in politics and public services.”

So what are your thoughts on the Good Society?

Churches Together in Britain and Ireland and Church Action on Poverty will be gathering the stories and views of all those who take part in the Good Society Conversation together over the coming months. These will help to inform what the Churches say together nationally in the run up to the UK General Election – but the Good Society is also something that all of us have a stake in just as importantly in our own neighbourhoods, villages, towns and cities across Britain and Ireland.

The Good Society Conversation: Now its over to you…

Good SocietyThe Good Society report and website explores what these questions mean to ordinary folk in seven communities across the UK – but now is the time for you to take part…

If you were to have a local ‘Good Society’ conversation with someone in your community tomorrow, who would it be? Which periphery would you start from, and who else – church leaders, politicians or others – might you invite to join in?

Download the handy guide to holding your own Good Society Conversation – and let us know how you get on!


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Entering the Wilderness: Come join the winning side

wildernessWe live in bleak times. We are bombarded by bad news.  At times we may feel discouraged, hopeless and impotent in the face of spending cuts and rising prices, whose impacts are bearing increasingly heavily on the lives of the some of poorest and most vulnerable in our communities. In a bleak climate, whither do we turn?  I, for one, don’t have all the answers – but here are a few thoughts.

Hearing the cry of the poor: A community of faith?

If we are entering a period in the Wilderness, do we need to return to our roots?  To find ways of embodying the core values and beliefs that many of us hold dear?  As Christians, these must surely include a duty to speak up for the poorest and most vulnerable  – articulating God’s bias to the poor – naming injustice as an act of faith and discipleship.

In a society which has seemingly lost its moral compass, can we find ways together of being a beacon for an alternative set of values? Can we find ways of becoming a community, for those who feel isolated, downtrodden, and (sadly) sometimes even ‘outsiders’ in their own church for holding true to such beliefs?  Surely there is no task more important for those of us who seek to follow in the footsteps of Jesus of Nazareth?

Speaking truth to power:  A community of witness?

Secondly, are there ways we an act as a community of public witness:  not just ‘speaking’ out, but offering a voice to those who are, normally, voiceless and marginalised? ‘Speaking truth to power’ is always counter-cultural and certainly a challenge to the ‘powers’ of the world. Even if no change is brought about as a result are not such ‘acts of witness’ intrinsically valuable?  It has certainly been encouraging in this regard to see church leaders from across the denominations speaking out strongly and persistently in the past few weeks about the growth of poverty and hunger, and the erosion of the welfare safety net which we all have to rely on when times get hard.  But what of our own role in such a community of witness?

Change agents: A community of solidarity?

Thirdly, is there also a role for us as agents of change?  I know from my work with Church Action on Poverty that empowering people with the skills and confidence to speak and act in their own right – can transform their own well-being, and lives and livelihoods are changed as a result.  More than this, through acting together we are able to bring about concrete changes in policies and institutions which affect peoples’ lives on a larger scale.

But, in the face of a Government determined to force through the deepest cuts in a generation, whilst denying that these cut have anything to do with the huge growth in foodbanks and hunger, it can feel like no change is possible: What happens if our actions appear to have no meaningful impact?

Taking the long view…

The end of slavery, the end of segregation, the end of apartheid… Each only came about as the result of a long struggle against a clear injustice (at least clear in the minds of those opposing it), a determined movement combining those directly affected and those whose faith drove them to campaign for the rights of others, and a passionate belief that another world was possible.  Even when all appeared to be hopeless, the candle of hope burned bright and in each case, the movement survived, regrouped and came back for more.

So let us not become disheartened.  As we enter the Wilderness, let us take the long view.  Let’s hold true to our faith, be steadfast in our witness, and courageous in our acts of solidarity.

Desmond-Tutu-001As Desmond Tutu famously said, in the face of the seemingly all powerful apartheid regime – ‘you may have the guns, you may have all this power, but you have already lost. Come: join the winning side.’ 

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

This is about truth and justice

image_miniChurch leaders speak with unprecedented united voice on welfare and food poverty

Church leaders from across the denominational spectrum have spoken out powerfully and with one voice to challenge the Government’s narrative on welfare, destitution and food poverty over the past week.

In 20 years its hard to think of any other issue on which such a breadth of church leaders from across the denominations have spoken out so clearly and powerfully from the same hymn sheet (as it were).

Nicols: Welfare cuts a ‘disgrace’ that has ripped apart nation’s safety net

nichols2014Cardinal Vincent Nicols led the way, a week ago, criticised the Government’s welfare cuts, calling them a “disgrace” and arguing that a safety net for the country’s most poor has been removed. The now Cardinal Nichols added that because of a punitive administration system, some people are being left with no resources for several weeks, relying instead on food banks.

43 Church leaders sign letter in support of End Hunger Fast

On Thursday, 43 Anglican, Methodist, Quaker and United Reformed Church leaders signed a joint open letter published in the Daily Mirror, which equally did not mince its words:

“We often hear talk of hard choices. Surely few can be harder than that faced by the tens of thousands of older people who must “heat or eat” each winter, harder than those faced by families whose wages have stayed flat while food prices have gone up 30% in just five years.
Yet beyond even this we must, as a society, face up to the fact that over half of people using foodbanks have been put in that situation by cut backs to and failures in the benefit system, whether it be payment delays or punitive sanctions.
There is an acute moral imperative to act. Hundreds of thousands of people are doing so already, as they set up and support foodbanks across the UK. But this is a national crisis, and one we must rise to.”

27 Anglican Bishops signed the letter, with many of them following up by taking to the airwaves on local and national tv and radio and in local papers to reinforce their support for the letter.

Archbishops of Canterbury, past and present, join the call

Justin WelbyIn the face of criticism of the Cardinal’s remarks from David Cameron and Nick Clegg, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, weighed into the fray, saying that Vincent Nichols was giving voice to an ‘upswell of feeling’ in communities with his warning that benefit cuts are leaving the poor facing ‘hunger and destitution.’

Rowan Williams, the ex Archbishop of Canterbury, added his voice on Friday, stating that:

“People who are using food banks are not scroungers who are cynically trying to work the system. They are drawn from the six million working poor in this country, people who are struggling to make ends meet in low paid or bitty employment.”

Methodist President: This is about truth and justiceruth-gee

And on Saturday, the President of the Methodist Conference, Rev Ruth Gee, posted a powerful blog entitled Trampling the head of the poor into the dust of the earth

It wasn’t acceptable in the time of Amos (8th century BC) and it isn’t acceptable now.
This isn’t about party politics.
This isn’t about scoring points.
This is about basic morality.
This is about according respect to human beings.
This is about feeding the hungry.
This is about facing up to the fact of our divided society, recognising inequality and injustice and doing something about it.
This is about truth and justice.

With church leaders from Wales and Scotland adding their voice, to date, there has not been a single church leader anywhere in the UK expressing a dissenting voice.

On this issue, the Churches are clear and united:  This is about respect for human beings, feeding the hungry, facing up to a divided society.  It is about truth and justice.

Next week sees the launch of the End Hunger Fast – sign up now!

Ash Wednesday next week (5 March) sees the launch of the End Hunger Fast – an unparallel opportunity for the churches – and others – to speak and act together with one mind.  If you haven’t signed up to the End Hunger Fast , do so now!

For those who doubted that the Churches – when the speak with one voice – can have a powerful national impact – and force politicians to think again about the policies which are having such a destructive impact on the lives of thousands in communities across the country – think again.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

End Hunger Fast: Government must act to tackle the nation’s food poverty crisis

The Government’s failure to take seriously the nation’s growing food poverty crisis has come under the spotlight today, with the launch of the End Hunger Fast campaign.

The Government finally released its oimage_miniwn long-suppressed report into food aid overnight, in response to the publication of a joint Open letter from 43 Church leaders published in the Daily Mirror this morning.

The report, commissioned almost a year ago from the Food Ethics Council by the Department for Food and Rural Affairs, confirms the growing demand for foodbanks is driven by people in crises situations, and directly refutes the Governments claims that it is caused by the growing number of foodbanks.

The DEFRA report states that “the most feed insecure households do not always turn to food aid.  The evidence suggests that turning to food aid is a strategy of last resort, when households have exhausted all other strategies.”

Worryingly, in the nine months since the report took its ‘snapshot’ last March, the situation has dramatically worsened, with many foodbanks reporting a doubling or trembling in demand since April.

Cameron and Clegg remain in denial over the impact of welfare changes

Most worrying of all has been the response of the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister to the Church Leaders statement that there is now an acute moral imperative to act in the face of a growing national crisis.

The Prime Minister, in claiming that ‘cutting benefits is the morally right thing to do’ has completely failed to gauge the seriousness of the situation facing hundreds of thousands across the country.  Whilst there are merits in the Government’s commitment to reform the welfare system, and to make work pay, there is nothing moral in cutting benefits for people who are already struggling to make ends meet.

The comments by Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, on LBC radio today, again fail to address the reality that the Government’s own punitive policies are exacerbating an already difficult situation that thousands are facing on a daily basis.  As Cardinal Vincent Nichol’s statement alluded to last week, over 800,000 people have had their benefits deliberately withdrawn as a result of an increasingly punitive sanctions regime, causing untold harm to families across the country.

This country has a proud tradition of protecting the poorest and most vulnerable.  We have all grown up with an understanding that if we fall on hard times, the welfare safety net will protect us from going hungry.  Sadly, for increasing numbers of people, that welfare safety net is no longer a reality.

The pendulum has swung far too far towards a punitive approach to people in poverty.  It is time to restore the principles of dignity, decency to the way we respond to those who fall on hard times.

We are not a poor nation who cannot afford to look after those who struggle.  We remain the seventh wealthiest nation on the planet.  In a week when it was revealed that sales of Ferraris in the UK outstripped those in any other EU country, it is right for the nation’s Church Leaders to challenge those in authority to think again.

It is time to End Hunger Fast.

Sign up to show you care at

Fast and donate

Please consider using the End Hunger Fast to raise funds for our work to tackle hunger. Your donations will pay for us to run public hearings, where people testify about their experiences of going hungry. Their evidence will form part of an Independent National Inquiry, which will make recommendations for how we can tackle the scandal of hunger.

Simply donate the money you would otherwise have spent on food.

Simply give us the money you would have spent on food.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment